October 22, 2009
Hope for people suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus
Benlysta (belimumab) significantly reduced SLE disease activity, disease flare rates and fatigue; significantly delayed time-to-first SLE disease flare; reduced prednisone use and improved health-related patient quality of life in the BLISS-52 study
GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) and Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: HGSI) announced the full presentation of results from BLISS-52, the first of two pivotal Phase 3 trials of Benlysta™ (belimumab) in seropositive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The data, which were presented today in Philadelphia at the 73rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), demonstrated that, in BLISS-52, belimumab plus standard of care achieved a clinically and statistically significant improvement in patient response rate as measured by the SLE Responder Index at Week 52, compared with placebo plus standard of care. Study results also showed that belimumab was generally well tolerated, with adverse event rates comparable between belimumab and placebo treatment groups.
“The BLISS-52 Phase 3 results presented at ACR demonstrated that the efficacy of treatment with Benlysta plus standard of care was superior to that of placebo plus standard of care,” said David C. Stump, M.D., Executive Vice President, Research and Development, HGS. “These data were statistically significant and were strongly supported across multiple measures of clinical effect and multiple time-points. Of note, a greater percentage of patients receiving Benlysta were able to reduce their use of steroids.”
Carlo Russo, M.D., Senior Vice President, Biopharm Development, GSK, said, “We have been pleased by the consistency of benefit demonstrated by belimumab in the BLISS-52 study, and we hope to confirm these results in the second Phase 3 study which is to report shortly. We very much hope that we will be able to deliver a new option for the treatment of this debilitating disease.”
Belimumab is an investigational drug and the first in a new class of drugs called BLyS-specific inhibitors. No new drug for lupus has been approved by regulatory authorities in more than 50 years. Belimumab is being developed by HGS and GSK under a co-development and commercialisation agreement entered into in August 2006. Results from BLISS-76, the second Phase 3 trial of belimumab, will be announced on 02 November 2009. Assuming the results from BLISS-76 are positive, HGS and GSK plan to submit marketing applications in the United States, Europe and other regions in the first half of 2010.
Key Findings Presented at ACR from Phase 3 BLISS-52 Study
Professor Sandra V. Navarra, M.D., a principal investigator and Head of Rheumatology at the University of Santo Tomas, Manila, The Philippines, presented efficacy and safety results from the Phase 3 BLISS-52 study. “These data suggest that belimumab could emerge to play an important role in the future treatment of patients with SLE,” said Dr. Navarra. “Patients with SLE can experience a range of potentially debilitating symptoms, some of which can involve major organs and flare unpredictably several times during a year. For patients with severe symptoms, SLE can be fatal. It is a disease that represents a major unmet medical need. We are very encouraged by the BLISS-52 data and look forward to the results of the BLISS-76 study, which we hope will confirm the therapeutic potential of belimumab.”
Among 865 patients randomised and treated, belimumab met its primary efficacy endpoint by achieving a superior SLE patient response rate at Week 52 vs. placebo.
* A clinically and statistically significant improvement was shown in patient response rate for belimumab plus standard of care vs. placebo plus standard of care: 57.6% for 10 mg/kg belimumab, 51.4% for 1 mg/kg belimumab, and 43.6% for placebo (p=0.0006 and p=0.013 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively).
* The BLISS-52 patient response rate was based on the SLE Responder Index (SRI), which defines patient response by an improvement in SELENA SLEDAI score of 4 points or greater, with no clinically significant BILAG worsening, and no clinically significant worsening in Physician’s Global Assessment.
* There were more responders in the 10 mg/kg belimumab group compared to the placebo group between Weeks 4 and 8 of the study and this difference was statistically significant at Week 16 (p<0.05 for 10 mg/kg belimumab vs. placebo). The improvement was statistically significant and sustained for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab from Week 24 and Week 28, respectively, through 52 weeks (p<0.05 for both belimumab treatment groups).
* The improvement in patient response rate was generally consistent across subgroups.
* A dose response trend was observed, with a greater rate of patient response in the 10 mg/kg belimumab dose group.
* Results for each individual component of the SRI strongly support the overall improvement shown for the primary endpoint.
Key findings of the BLISS-52 study also included the following:
FLARES
* Belimumab significantly delayed time to first SLE disease flare versus placebo (SLE Flare Index/SFI): median = 119 days for 10 mg/kg belimumab, 126 days for 1 mg/kg belimumab, and 84 days for placebo (p=0.0036 and p=0.0026 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively vs. placebo).
* The risk of having severe SLE disease flares (SFI) was reduced over 52 weeks by 43% in the 10 mg/kg belimumab treatment group and by 24% in the 1 mg/kg belimumab treatment group vs. placebo (p=0.0055 and p=0.1342 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively).
* The risk of having 1 BILAG A (severe flare) or more than 1 BILAG B (moderate flare) organ domain score was reduced by 42% in the 10 mg/kg belimumab treatment group and by 13% in the 1 mg/kg treatment group vs. placebo (p=0.0016 and p=0.3722 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively).
DISEASE ACTIVITY
* A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving belimumab achieved a reduction in SELENA SLEDAI score of at least 4 points by Week 52 (p=0.0024 and p=0.019 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively, vs. placebo), with improvement observed for 10 mg/kg belimumab within 4-8 weeks and reaching statistical significance at Week 16 and Weeks 24-52 (p<0.05 vs. placebo).
* A significantly greater improvement in Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 52 was observed in the belimumab treatment groups, with a mean percentage change from baseline of 45.7% for 10 mg/kg belimumab, 39.3% for 1 mg/kg belimumab, and 27.8% for placebo (p<0.0001 and p=0.004 for 10 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively, vs. placebo). The improvement in PGA was observed within 4-8 weeks and was sustained through 52 weeks (p<0.05 for both belimumab treatment groups).
STEROID USE
* In patients who were receiving >7.5 mg per day of prednisone at baseline, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the 1 mg/kg belimumab treatment group vs. the placebo group had their average prednisone dose reduced by at least 25% from baseline to 7.5 mg per day or less during the last 12 weeks of study (p=0.025). A higher percentage of patients in the 10 mg/kg belimumab treatment group vs. the placebo group also had their average prednisone dose reduced by at least 25% from baseline to 7.5 mg per day or less during the last 12 weeks of study, but the difference did not reach a level of statistical significance (p=0.053).
* In patients who were receiving <7.5>7.5 mg per day during the last 20 weeks of study (p<0.05). Fewer increases in prednisone use also were observed in the 1 mg/kg belimumab treatment group vs. the placebo group during the last 20 weeks of study, but the difference did not reach a level of statistical significance.
FATIGUE AND QUALITY OF LIFE
* Improved fatigue scores were observed in the 10 mg/kg belimumab treatment group vs. the placebo group within 4-8 weeks, and both belimumab treatment groups achieved statistically significant improvement of fatigue by Week 52 (FACIT-Fatigue Scale; p<0.05 for both belimumab groups vs. the placebo group).
* Improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score at Week 24, a prespecified major secondary endpoint, was not significantly different among treatment groups. HRQOL improvement as measured by the SF-36 PCS score at Week 52 was significantly greater in both belimumab treatment groups vs. the placebo group (p=0.025 for 10 mg/kg and p=0.027 for 1 mg/kg belimumab, respectively).
SAFETY
* In BLISS-52, belimumab was generally well tolerated, with rates of overall adverse events, serious adverse events, infections and fatalities comparable between belimumab and placebo treatment groups. Serious infections were reported in 5.9% of patients on placebo and 6.1% of patients on belimumab. The most common adverse events were headache, arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infection and influenza, and were also comparable between belimumab and placebo treatment groups. No malignancies were reported.
About the Benlysta (belimumab) Phase 3 Development Programme
The Phase 3 development programme for belimumab includes two double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre Phase 3 superiority trials – BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard of care, versus placebo plus standard of care, in seropositive (HEp-2 ANA > 1:80 and/or anti-dsDNA > 30 IU/mL) patients with SLE. This is the largest clinical trial programme ever conducted in lupus patients. BLISS-52 randomised and treated 865 patients at 90 clinical sites in 13 countries, primarily in Asia, South America and Eastern Europe. BLISS-76 enrolled and randomised 826 patients at 133 clinical sites in 19 countries, primarily in North America and Europe. The design of the two trials is similar, but the duration of therapy in the two studies is different – 52 weeks for BLISS-52 and 76 weeks for BLISS-76. The data from BLISS-76 will be analysed after 52 weeks in support of a potential Biologics License Application in the United States and Marketing Authorisation Applications in Europe and other regions. HGS designed the Phase 3 programme for belimumab in collaboration with GSK and leading international SLE experts, and the programme is being conducted under a Special Protocol Assessment agreement with FDA.
The primary efficacy endpoint of BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 is the patient response rate at Week 52 based on the SLE Responder Index, which is defined by: (1) a reduction from baseline of at least 4 points on the SELENA SLEDAI disease activity scale (which indicates a clinically important reduction in SLE disease activity); (2) no worsening of disease as measured by the Physician’s Global Assessment (worsening defined as an increase of 0.30 points or more from baseline); (3) no new BILAG A organ domain score (which indicates a severe flare of lupus disease activity) and no more than one new BILAG B organ domain score (which indicates a moderate flare of disease activity).
Analysis for the primary endpoint is based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and adjusted for baseline stratification factors, including SELENA SLEDAI score, proteinuria and race.
In each of the two Phase 3 trials, patients were randomised to one of three treatment groups: 10 mg/kg belimumab (BLISS-52, n=290), 1 mg/kg belimumab (BLISS-52, n=288), or placebo (BLISS-52, n=287). Patients are dosed intravenously on Days 0, 14 and 28, then every 28 days thereafter for the duration of the study. All patients receive standard of care therapy in addition to the study medication. Safety is reviewed by an independent Data Monitoring Committee throughout both studies.
About Benlysta (belimumab)
Belimumab is an investigational human monoclonal antibody drug that specifically recognizes and inhibits the biological activity of B-lymphocyte stimulator, or BLyS®. BLyS is a naturally occurring protein discovered by HGS that is required for the development of B-lymphocyte cells into mature plasma B cells. Plasma B cells produce antibodies, the body’s first line of defense against infection. In lupus and certain other autoimmune diseases, elevated levels of BLyS are believed to contribute to the production of autoantibodies – antibodies that attack and destroy the body’s own healthy tissues. The presence of autoantibodies appears to correlate with disease severity. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that belimumab can reduce autoantibody levels in SLE. BLISS 52 results suggest that belimumab can reduce SLE disease activity. Results from a second Phase 3 trial, BLISS-76, are expected on November 2, 2009.
About Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, life-threatening autoimmune disease. Approximately five million people worldwide, including approximately 1.5 million in the United States, suffer from various forms of lupus, including SLE. Lupus can occur at any age, but appears mostly in young people ages 15 to 45. About 90 percent of those diagnosed with lupus are women. African-American women are about three times more likely to develop lupus, and it is also more common in Hispanic, Asian and American Indian women. Symptoms may include extreme fatigue, painful and swollen joints, unexplained fever, skin rash and kidney problems. Lupus can lead to arthritis, kidney failure, heart and lung inflammation, central nervous system abnormalities, inflammation of the blood vessels and blood disorders. For more information on lupus, visit the Lupus Foundation of America at www.lupus.org, the Lupus Research Institute at www.lupusresearchinstitute.org, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at www.niams.nih.gov, or Lupus Europe at www.elef.rheumanet.org.
Immunization prevents 2.5 million child deaths every year
For the first time in documented history, the number of children dying every year has fallen below ten million — partly the result of improved access to immunization, integrated delivery of essential health interventions, as well as clean water and sanitation.
Immunization prevents an estimated 2.5 million child deaths every year in all age groups from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), and measles. It is one of the most successful and cost-effective public health interventions.
More children than ever are being reached with immunization. In 2008, an estimated 106 million children under the age of one were vaccinated with three doses of diphtheria―tetanus―pertussis (DTP3) vaccine. These children are protected against infectious diseases that can have serious consequences like illness, disability or death.
Despite the progress, an estimated 24 million children under the age of one did not receive the DTP3 vaccine doses in 2008. About three quarters of these children live in ten countries: Chad, China, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan and Uganda.
An estimated 1.3 million infants and young children die every year from pneumococcal disease and rotavirus diarrhoea. A large number of these deaths can be prevented through vaccination.
A large number of vaccine products are currently in the pipeline and are expected to become available by 2012. More than 80 candidate vaccines are in the late stages of clinical testing. About 30 of these candidate vaccines aim to protect against major diseases for which no licensed vaccines exist, such as dengue and malaria.
The Meningitis Vaccine Project is working on a new meningococcal vaccine. Meningitis A epidemics severely affect certain sub―Saharan countries. A first―generation malaria vaccine has also demonstrated some level of efficacy in young children and may be available by 2015.
Vaccination has led to the elimination of measles in the WHO Region of the Americas. Global measles mortality has decreased by 74% from 750 000 deaths in 2000 to 197 000 deaths in 2007, thanks to intensified vaccination campaigns.
Polio has been eradicated in three of WHO’s six regions and is today endemic in only four countries ― Afghanistan, India, Nigeria and Pakistan ― down from 125 countries in 1988. Annual deaths from neonatal tetanus have fallen to an estimated 128 000, down from 790 000 deaths in 1988.
Immunization not only protects children from vaccine―preventable diseases. It also serves as a means to deliver other life―saving measures, such as vitamin A supplements to prevent malnutrition, insecticide―treated nets for protection against malaria and deworming medicine for intestinal worms.
October 19, 2009
Adults With Depression Still Struggle Due to Lack of Information
A new survey of 2,001 adults living with depression revealed that despite being diagnosed for an average of 12 years, many unknowingly took actions that could have sabotaged their chances of getting well. Furthermore, on average, it took about six years for respondents to seek diagnosis from a health care professional, suggesting these adults may have been coping with depression for as long as 18 years.Nearly three in five (57 percent) of those who delayed seeking a diagnosis felt they could manage their own depression symptoms. Among respondents who had taken antidepressants for depression, nearly half (47 percent) did not discuss when it might be necessary to change medications with their doctor, despite the fact that they were still experiencing depressive symptoms. Among those who have stopped taking antidepressants, about two in five (41 percent) did so without telling their doctor. More than 70 percent noted that talk therapy should always be part of a depression treatment plan, yet only 22 percent were currently enrolled in talk therapy.
"The survey strongly suggests that many people living with depression are unaware or are 'missing pieces' of vital information that may be preventing them from getting well," said Dr. Susan Kornstein, professor of psychiatry and obstetrics and gynecology at Virginia Commonwealth University. "Depression needs to be treated by a health care professional. To increase the likelihood of recovery from depression, it's important that people with depression have a comprehensive treatment plan that may include medications, psychotherapy and lifestyle changes. The goal is to help them to recovery." Depression, which includes a variety of symptoms, is a highly treatable illness, but it can become more difficult to treat the longer it goes undiagnosed or undertreated.
The survey showed that among those who waited six months or more to be diagnosed, 69 percent reported they delayed diagnosis because they lacked knowledge about depression or lacked basic facts about available depression treatments and where to go for help. Additionally, among those who wanted more information about depression treatment at the time of diagnosis, 64 percent said they wanted to know what it means to "get well.". Surprisingly, 91 percent have been prescribed an antidepressant for depression, but among them, just seven percent felt very knowledgeable about all basic aspects of the treatment.
Pfizer’s Oral JAK Inhibitor Demonstrates Response In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Final Phase 2 Analyses Presented at the American College of Rheumatology/ Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (ACR/ARHP) Annual Scientific Meeting
Pfizer Inc announced that 24-week data from two clinical studies of the oral JAK inhibitor, CP-690,550, confirmed statistically significant ACR20 response and DAS28 remission rates for several doses versus placebo when given alone or in combination with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The findings, which were presented at the 2009 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting in Philadelphia, represent the final analyses from two Phase 2 trials evaluating the effect of CP-690,550 over 24 weeks.
“These data suggest that CP-690,550 could represent a promising advance for patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” said Michael Berelowitz, MD, senior vice president Clinical Development and Medical Affairs for Pfizer Specialty Care. “Our Phase 3 program is currently underway with enrollment progressing as planned, and we are hopeful that data from these trials will validate the Phase 2 results.”
Efficacy as Monotherapy at 24 weeks
Data presented from a six-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2B study (Study A3921035), which evaluated 384 patients with active RA who had not responded to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), showed that patients treated with 5, 10 and 15 mg twice-daily doses of CP-690,550 dosed without background methotrexate experienced statistically significant ACR response rates and DAS28 remission rates at week 24 as compared to placebo. These results were consistent with the previously reported primary analysis of ACR response at week 12.
| 24-Week efficacy results are as follows: | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Treatment | | ACR20(%) | | ACR50(%) | | ACR70(%) | | DAS28 Remission(%) |
| | 1 mg | | 24.1 | | 7.4 | | 5.6 | | 5.8 |
| | 3 mg | | 37.3 | | 27.5* | | 13.7 | | 13.7* |
| | 5 mg | | 51.0* | | 34.7* | | 20.4* | | 14.6* |
| | 10 mg | | 65.6*** | | 44.3*** | | 37.7*** | | 21.3** |
| | 15 mg | | 66.7*** | | 54.4*** | | 33.3** | | 21.1** |
| | Placebo | | 25.4 | | 10.2 | | 6.8 | | 1.8 |
| *p≤0.05 **p≤0.01 *** p≤0.0001 | |||||||||
| | |||||||||
All patients were randomized to either placebo or one of the studied doses of CP-690,550. This study also included adalimumab (40 mg subcutaneously every other week) as an active control in the first 12 weeks of the study.
Efficacy in Combination with Methotrexate at 24 weeks
Data from a second six-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study (Study A3921025) evaluating 507 patients whose RA was active despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate demonstrated that patients treated with 3, 10 and 15 mg twice-daily and 20 mg once-daily doses of CP-690,550 in addition to stable background methotrexate experienced statistically significant ACR response rates and DAS28 remission rates at week 24 as compared to placebo. These results were consistent with previously reported primary analysis of ACR response at week 12.
| 24 week efficacy results are as follows: | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Treatment | | ACR20(%) | | ACR50(%) | | ACR70(%) | | DAS28 Remission(%) |
| | 1 mg | | 41.4 | | 31.4 | | 20.0* | | 13.2 |
| | 3 mg | | 52.9* | | 27.9 | | 19.1* | | 23.9* |
| | 5 mg | | 47.9 | | 33.8 | | 19.7* | | 28.6* |
| | 10 mg | | 55.4* | | 35.1 | | 17.6 | | 29.6* |
| | 15 mg | | 58.7* | | 44.0* | | 30.7** | | 29.7* |
| | 20 mg | | 52.5* | | 38.8* | | 23.8* | | 22.8* |
| | Placebo | | 34.8 | | 23.2 | | 7.3 | | 10.5 |
| *p≤0.05 **p≤0.01 | |||||||||
| | |||||||||
This study evaluated CP-690,550 doses of 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 mg twice daily and 20 mg once daily. All patients were maintained on their stable background of methotrexate and randomized to either addition of placebo or one of the studied doses of CP-690,550.
In both studies, the most commonly-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were urinary tract infections, headache, and diarrhea. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were infrequent. Dose-dependent decreases in mean neutrophil counts and increases in mean LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol were consistent with what has been observed in previous studies of CP-690,550 in RA. For patients dosed on background methotrexate, transaminase increases were also consistent with what had been reported in interim analyses in previous studies of CP-690,550 in RA.
All studies were sponsored by Pfizer Inc.
ORAL Trials: Advancing Clinical Research for RA
The Phase 3 program, which is known as the ORAL (Oral CP-690,550 Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3 TriaLs) Program, consists of six Phase 3 studies at more than 350 locations in 35 countries worldwide (www.ORALtrials.com.)
About CP-690,550
CP-690,550 is an oral, selective, potent inhibitor of the JAK family of enzymes. In cell-based assays, CP-690,550 has been shown to inhibit JAK-3 and JAK-1 with functional selectivity over JAK-2. By inhibiting these enzymes, which affect the signaling of multiple cytokines (proteins released by cells to communicate with other cells) that are involved in a broad spectrum of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, treatment with CP-690,550 may lead to clinically meaningful improvement for patients.
CP-690,550 is also being evaluated as a potential treatment for psoriasis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and solid organ transplant.
October 17, 2009
Vorinostat Reduces Formation of Brain Metastases in Mice
For people, while various therapies are improving the survival of breast cancer patients, the incidence of breast cancer spreading to the brain is increasing. Brain metastases of breast cancer have proven to be largely untreatable because the blood-brain barrier, which arises from the specialized structure of blood capillaries in the brain, severely limits drug access and many drugs are actively transported out of brain at this barrier. Consequently, the one-year survival estimate for breast cancer patients after a diagnosis of brain metastasis is only about 20 percent.
Vorinostat has been found to slow the growth of primary tumors of several different types of cancer in mice. Previous studies have suggested that the drug can be taken up by the brain, although little was known about its effects on metastatic tumors. Therefore, to study the effect of vorinostat on the formation of brain metastases, scientists used a mouse model of human breast cancer. Human breast cells were cultured in the laboratory and were injected into mice with compromised immune systems. The breast cancer cells then migrated to the brain, forming metastases. "Drugs that can cross the blood-brain barrier and reduce the size and incidence of metastatic tumors are urgently needed," said Patricia S. Steeg, Ph.D., study author, Center for Cancer Research, NCI. The researchers found that vorinostat was absorbed readily into normal mouse brains, and accumulation of the drug was up to three-fold higher in some metastases treated with this drug when compared to surrounding brain tissue. Vorinostat also reduced the development of tiny tumors (micrometastases) in mice by 28 percent when compared with mice that did not receive this therapy.
www.nci.nih.gov
3.2 Million Europeans Are Diagnosed With Cancer Every Year
Every year 3.2 million Europeans are diagnosed with cancer, mostly breast, colorectal or lung cancers, according to European Commission report. In 2006 in Europe, there were an estimated 3 191 600 cancer cases diagnosed (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) and 1 703 000 deaths from cancer. The most common form of cancers was breast cancer (429 900 cases, 13.5% of all cancer cases), followed by colorectal cancers (412 900, 12.9%) and lung cancer (386 300, 12.1%). Lung cancer, with an estimated 334 800 deaths (19.7% of total), was the most common cause of death from cancer, followed by colorectal (207 400 deaths), breast (131 900) and stomach (118 200) cancers, according to European Society for Medical Oncology. Breast cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in women in Europe. A fall in breast cancer mortality rates in most European countries in the 1990s was reported by several studies. These declines have been attributed to the combined effect of earlier detection and improving treatment, but it was observed mainly in young women, and because of the ageing of the European population the number of deaths from breast cancer is still rising (130 000 in 2004, 132 000 in 2006). Excess body weight causes over 124,000 new cancers a year
Dr Renehan, who is a senior lecturer in cancer studies and surgery at the University of Manchester (UK), and his colleagues in the UK, The Netherlands and Switzerland, created a sophisticated model to estimate the proportion of cancers that could be attributed to excess body weight in 30 European countries. Using data from a number of sources including the World Health Organisation and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, they estimated that in 2002 (the most recent year for which there are reliable statistics on cancer incidence in Europe) there had been over 70,000 new cases of cancer attributable to excess BMI out of a total of nearly 2.2 million new diagnoses across the 30 European countries. Then, the researchers projected the figures forward to 2008, taking into account what was known about shifts in the distribution of BMI, the dramatic decline in women’s use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) from 2002 onwards following research that showed it increased the risk of breast cancer, and the wider use of PSA screening for prostate cancer in men.
They found that the number of cancers that could be attributed to excess body weight increased to 124,050 in 2008. In men, 3.2% of new cancers could be attributed to being overweight or obese and in women it was 8.6%. The largest number of obesity-related new cancers was for endometrial cancer (33,421), post-menopausal breast cancer (27,770) and colorectal cancer (23,730). These three accounted for 65% of all cancers attributable to excess BMI.
The number of new cases of obesity-related oesophageal cancer was particularly high in the UK relative to the rest of Europe. “This country accounts for 54% of new cases across all 30 countries,” said Dr Renehan. “This may be due to synergistic interactions between smoking, alcohol, excess body weight and acid reflux – and is currently an area where research is required.”